The Odds of getting three Triangles in Genesis 1:1 & John 1:1

[Alex]

I made a mistake with the other image I shared about this somewhere in this Forum.
So I remade the image so it is correct and I added some extra stuff to it.

Triangle 112 (Medium).png (918.17 KiB) Viewed 16427 times

Odds of Creation Triangles (Medium).png (557.14 KiB) Viewed 718 times

[Alex]

Did a mistake with the probability regarding verse# 6328, so the final probability for the 7 Triangles is nearly 3.5 trillion.

[RAMcGough]

Did a mistake with the probability regarding verse# 6328, so the final probability for the 7 Triangles is nearly 3.5 trillion.

You also did many mistakes in your probability calculations. There is not a single competent mathematician on the planet who would agree with your claims. Not one.

Your primary statistical error is called post-hoc data dredging (aka the Texas sharpshooter fallacy). You scan a vast combinatorial space of possibilities using different languages (Hebrew/Greek/English), 54 gematria ciphers (standard, ordinal, reduced, reversed, etc., etc., etc.), arbitrary words not found anywhere in context ("riddles", "inverse"), random verse selections, connected to the whole range of figurate numbers and their indexes, prime indexes etc., etc., etc. and then you CHERRY PICK a tiny set of coincidences from the effectively infinite set of random numbers your methods generate.

You statistical calculations are demonstrably false and absurd.

You're not a mathematician Alex. You don't know how to do basic statistics. You can't defend your claims with real math. Please take no offence - that's just the way it is. I'm just describing the truth (with love and kindness I hope!)

Bottom line: You're deceiving yourself with your massive collection of "hits" cherry picked from a much more massive ocean of random numbers generated by your many methods.

I hope this helps you free yourself from this delusion.

I pray God will bless you and open your mind to see and understand this explanation I have given.

Much peace to you Alex!

Richard

[Alex]

Thanks for illuminating me. Now please show us how to calculate the probability correctly since I am off track.
You can't come here and say it is false and wrong without showing us how it is done.

Peace and blessings to you.

[Alex]

Ah I see what I did wrong here. I said "probability" instead of "odds" here. That's it.
I will change the image.
I think about odds and probability as the same. But that is not correct as it is a tiny difference.

[Alex]

Alright, the image has been changed. Thanks Richard! You learn something everyday.

[Alex]

I did a check on what verses hits reduced, ordinal & standard values as Triangle in the Bible:


Verse orders where reduced, ordinal & standard values are all Triangle:
4219 = C.Hex(38 "inverse" (E r) = "Alpha" (E o))
5543 = “seven hundred seventy and seven riddles and” שבע מאות ושבעים ושבע חידה ואת (Fo+Fs) = 7x7x7 + 100x52 “codes” קודים (o)
15313 = 15000 + center of gravity in Tri(37 "of wisdom" (o))


Verse orders where reverse reduced, reverse ordinal & reverse standard values are all Triangle:
903 "Alpha" אלפא (rr+ro+rs)
14165 = Happy(2166 "Golden Ratio" (E rs))
21550 = perimeter of Penta(4311 = Pri(84 = Tri(7) + Tri(7) + Tri(7)) with an extended digit)

This shows us that having three gematria systems hitting a Triangle is extremely rare. The fact that verse# 903 is one of these verses is way too incredible to be ignored.

[RAMcGough]

Thanks for illuminating me. Now please show us how to calculate the probability correctly since I am off track.
You can't come here and say it is false and wrong without showing us how it is done.

Peace and blessings to you.

Just ask any AI to review your claims about statistics and to explain if they are not valid. It's very simple.

[Alex]

So there are 31102 verses in the Bible and when integrating two verses (like Gen 1:1 & John 1:1) we can get a maximum possible verse integrations of (31102*31102)/2 = 483,667,202. And all these integrations are unique.
I made a program that did this number of verse integrations and we got 13847 hits of verses having reduced, ordinal & standard values being Triangle.
The odds of a verse integration having this quality is then: 483667202/13847 ≈ 1 out of 34929.
See here to see the 13847 verse integrations that has this quality: https://777codes.com/wp-content/uploads ... iangle.txt

Verse orders where reverse reduced, reverse ordinal & reverse standard values are all Triangle:
1. 903
2. 14165
3. 21550

Number of verses that has a reduced value being Triangle = 1506
Number of verses that has a ordinal value being Triangle = 951
Number of verses that has a standard value being Triangle = 354

So we can do this also to see the odds of getting the three Triangles in Genesis 1:1 & John 1:1, three Triangles in verse# 903 and the Triangle in verse# 6328:
(483667202/13847)*(31102/3)*(31102/354) ≈ 1 out of 31,815,815,794 (31.8 billion)

[Alex]

Here is the summary of what Grok say about this:

Alex's raw data (the 13,847 pair count) is cool and shows these triple-triangle integrations really are uncommon in the full combinatorial space—props for doing the exhaustive check. But the final "1 in 31.8 billion" figure is classic overstated Bible-numerology odds. It looks impressive but doesn't survive basic statistical scrutiny because of selection bias and multiple testing. It's confirmatory for someone already convinced of hidden patterns, but it isn't evidence of intentional design any more than finding a rare word combination in Shakespeare after searching every possible pair.
If the program/code and exact definitions of "integration" and the triangular checks were shared, it would be even easier to verify or extend (e.g., how many hits for other shapes like squares?). But as presented, it's a good example of why raw rarity numbers in gematria studies need heavy caveats. The preceding post in the thread was right to suggest getting an AI (or statistician) to review it!

I have to remind readers that the word "proof" is very academically loaded word. They require a lot from you before you can call something proof.
I have simply showed the chance of getting these Triangles using the Bible itself as a source. That does not count as imperical proof, but the chance shows us that this has to be design in my opinion. Let me remind you that the academic communty and science community has mostly been against God, and I believe they have loaded the word "proof" with a lot of requirements just to make it hard for people to prove anything regarding the Bible.
When Ivan Panin presented his work, no one really tried to attack him from the academic community at that time as far as I know.
But I guess the academic community decided to never let another Bible codes prove anything again. And they have succeeded when you look at what Grok says here.