biblewheel.com

I just found something that emerged from a factor of Genesis 1.1 + John 1.1, combined with the gematria of 'Holy Spirit' in Greek.

6328 = 28 x 226

Pneuma Hagion (s) = 710

710/226 = 3.14159292. . . .

This overestimates pi by an incredibly tiny margin of 0.000008%, or 1 part in 12 million, giving the first seven digits of pi.

I'm not sure if it's genuine, as 710 is not found in either verse. However 710 is the difference between the first and second words of Genesis 1.1

913 - 203 = 710.

We also have 6328 as an anagram of 6.283, first 4 digits of tau (2pi).

We could use 113 as the divisor to give tau with the same accuracy, and if tau (circumference/radius) were used instead of pi, some physical formulae would simplify, so the universe prefers tau. The first word in the Bible with value of 113 is a construct of radah/rule in Gen. 1.26.

Addendum: 355/113 is a famous and excellent approximation of pi, discovered by Zu Chongzhi in about 480AD. This page has a good video on its discovery, of anyone is interested. https://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2025 ... y-355-113/

Interestingly, the denominator and numerator concatenate to give 113355.

The 37th number that is the sum of 4 distinct squares = 113 

See here : https://oeis.org/A004433

We should like to know what these 4 distinct squares are, preferably in ascending order: 

113 = 2² + 3² + 6² + 8² 

355 / (2² + 3² + 6² + 8²) = 3.141593 

2368 / 3.141593 = 754 

● "Jesus Christ" (SH) = 754 
● "Jesus Christ" (SG) = 2368

The first appearance of 754 in the decimal expansion of pi begins at the 1153rd digit and the first appearance of 2368 begins at the 7481st digit:

7481 - 1153 = 2701 + 3627 

● G 1:1 (SH) = 2701 
● J 1:1 (SG) = 3627

Notice that not only is 754 and 2368 themselves in a pi ratio, their positions in pi unite the two key "creation verses" in the Hebrew OT/Greek NT. 


What about 355? Our friend Enoch is tied to this number: 

Genesis 5:24 
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him" (OH) = 355 

This is peculiar in itself, since a leap lunar year = 355 days and Enoch was in the Matrix for 365 years (solar year = 365 days).


Blessings, 

Leo

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 10:32 am The 37th number that is the sum of 4 distinct squares = 113 

See here : https://oeis.org/A004433

We should like to know what these 4 distinct squares are, preferably in ascending order: 

113 = 2² + 3² + 6² + 8² 

355 / (2² + 3² + 6² + 8²) = 3.141593 

Sensational stuff, Leo! I'm still not sure whether or not what I found is an encoding, but 113 is certainly of interest as a factor of 6328, especially since 6328 is an anagram of 2368.

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 10:32 am
2368 / 3.141593 = 754 

● "Jesus Christ" (SH) = 754 
● "Jesus Christ" (SG) = 2368

Today is Sq.rt.10 Day (well I'm calling it that) and 2368/749 = 3.16154. . . which is of similar accuracy.

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 10:32 am The first appearance of 754 in the decimal expansion of pi begins at the 1153rd digit and the first appearance of 2368 begins at the 7481st digit:

7481 - 1153 = 2701 + 3627 

● G 1:1 (SH) = 2701 
● J 1:1 (SG) = 3627

Notice that not only is 754 and 2368 themselves in a pi ratio, their positions in pi unite the two key "creation verses" in the Hebrew OT/Greek NT. 

I have trouble with pi 'encodings', since the digits are created by fixed formulae. Evidence like this can mean only one of two things:

1. There is a deep structure in numbers we don't properly understand, a hidden order (perhaps related to polygon numbers, since the circle is an 'infinity-gon'?). That of course would mean that there is a hidden order in the digits of pi.
2. The digits are random and so these findings are showing us how easy it is to find spurious patterns, which would be a lesson to us all.

I still haven't made my mind up about that one.

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 10:32 am
What about 355? Our friend Enoch is tied to this number: aged to

Genesis 5:24 
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him" (OH) = 355 

This is peculiar in itself, since a leap lunar year = 355 days and Enoch was in the Matrix for 365 years (solar year = 365 days).

Not sure about that one either. I always thought it interesting, though, that Methuselah lived for 969 years, since this is the 17th tetrahedron, the 3D extension of 153, T17, and mirror of 351, T26.

So we have

YHVH (r) = 17
YHVH (o, s) = 26

and of course 1^3 + 5 ^3 + 3 ^3 = 153

The 24th tetrahedron is 2600, with each face having 300 spheres, and you know the gematria (Ihsous (r) = 24). It works better in English, because the 24th square pyramid is 4900 and we have

God (o) = 26
Lord (o) = 49

Bill

bluetriangle wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 11:39 am I have trouble with pi 'encodings', since the digits are created by fixed formulae. Evidence like this can mean only one of two things:

1. There is a deep structure in numbers we don't properly understand, a hidden order (perhaps related to polygon numbers, since the circle is an 'infinity-gon'?). That of course would mean that there is a hidden order in the digits of pi.
2. The digits are random and so these findings are showing us how easy it is to find spurious patterns, which would be a lesson to us all.

Hi Bill, 

I completely agree that the digits of pi themselves cannot be "tweaked" and are necessarily fixed. However, there's a third option: Even in the absence of a hidden order in pi, God could still have chosen the values of his name (754/2368) and the values of Genesis 1:1/John 1:1 (2701/3627) such that they would yield a ratio of pi and unite the two key "creation verses" within pi. In this case, the values themselves are chosen but the digits of pi are untouched (the values are simply chosen to align and form a perfect match within pi). 

The same thing is true for geometric pairings: The geometry itself is determined by the formulas but the alphanumeric identities were chosen to match the geometric pairings. In other words, the necessary results of a given formula doesn't rule out design because an encoder (especially an omniscient encoder) can produce an outside code that will form alignments with those necessary results.


Blessings to you, 

Leo

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 1:21 pm Hi Bill, 

I completely agree that the digits of pi themselves cannot be "tweaked" and are necessarily fixed. However, there's a third option: Even in the absence of a hidden order in pi, God could still have chosen the values of his name (754/2368) and the values of Genesis 1:1/John 1:1 (2701/3627) such that they would yield a ratio of pi and unite the two key "creation verses" within pi. In this case, the values themselves are chosen but the digits of pi are untouched (the values are simply chosen to align and form a perfect match within pi). 

The same thing is true for geometric pairings: The geometry itself is determined by the formulas but the alphanumeric identities were chosen to match the geometric pairings. In other words, the necessary results of a given formula doesn't rule out design because an encoder (especially an omniscient encoder) can produce an outside code that will form alignments with those necessary results.


Blessings to you, 

Leo

Hey Leo,

This brings up that old problem about the "number of options" that God had. If he wanted to design G1:1/J1:1 using the symmetric primes 37/73 and symmetric semiprimes 39/93 and have them unite as 6328 = T(112) = AB + C² = 999 x 73² to encode His name YHVH Elohim and anagram of 2368 (Jesus Christ), and self-similarity of products of hex/star pairs G1:1 = H(4) x S(4) and "and the earth" = H(3) x S(3) etc., etc., etc. then is seems a pretty huge "lucky coincidence" that the predetermined sequence of digits in pi would "just happen" to align with all those other patterns He freely chose and so carefully designed.

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 1:21 pm
I completely agree that the digits of pi themselves cannot be "tweaked" and are necessarily fixed. However, there's a third option: Even in the absence of a hidden order in pi, God could still have chosen the values of his name (754/2368) and the values of Genesis 1:1/John 1:1 (2701/3627) such that they would yield a ratio of pi and unite the two key "creation verses" within pi. In this case, the values themselves are chosen but the digits of pi are untouched (the values are simply chosen to align and form a perfect match within pi). 

Yes, I should have added that. It is a third possibility. But it's a very limited one, given the constraints imposed by the fact that numbers like 2701, 2368, etc, have so many other numerical and geometric properties that God obviously found useful in creating a code. If these properties extend to the decimal digits of pi, e, etc, then He would make use of these numbers, yes.

But there is a danger here, the same as with substituting words and phrases via shared numerical properties (ie doing gematria). The digits extend to infinity and we know the first trillion or whatever. You could probably find anything you want in those decimal digits. I know John found 58 and 57 in the first few decimal digits of pi and I accept that as a genuine encoding in the sense we are discussing, not of pi itself but of numbers that happen to appear in the digits of pi and may therefore have been chosen for words, so they align with those digit sums or positioning. That's the same as choosing numbers like 2701 that happen to have rare numerical and geometric properties. But I've seen people go too far and I've seen the corollary: amazing random patterns in pi, such as the Feynman point, a sequence of six nines in a row early on in pi (it's seven in a row in tau). That is very very improbable yet real.

How do we know we aren't doing that? Maybe you don't have to go very far in pi before you find spurious patterns.

Megiddo wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 1:21 pm The same thing is true for geometric pairings: The geometry itself is determined by the formulas but the alphanumeric identities were chosen to match the geometric pairings. In other words, the necessary results of a given formula doesn't rule out design because an encoder (especially an omniscient encoder) can produce an outside code that will form alignments with those necessary results.

Absolutely.