biblewheel.com

δύναμις ὑψίστου ἐπισκιάσει σοι

ἐπισκιάζω overshadow
https://biblehub.com/greek/1982.htm


σκιά shadow
https://biblehub.com/greek/4639.htm

Mark 4:30-32 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... ersion=ESV
Καὶ ἔλεγεν, Πῶς ὁμοιώσωμεν τὴν βασιλείαν τοῦ θεοῦ, ἢ ἐν τίνι αὐτὴν παραβολῇ θῶμεν; ὡς κόκκῳ σινάπεως, ὃς ὅταν σπαρῇ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, μικρότερον ὂν πάντων τῶν σπερμάτων τῶν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, καὶ ὅταν σπαρῇ, ἀναβαίνει καὶ γίνεται μεῖζον πάντων τῶν λαχάνων καὶ ποιεῖ κλάδους μεγάλους, ὥστε δύνασθαι ὑπὸ τὴν σκιὰν αὐτοῦ τὰ πετεινὰ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ κατασκηνοῦν.

I thought the mustardseed to be the letter "yud" = middle letter of Genesis 1:1 depicted as triangular form



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYBqaB-g3lA

"He made darkness His hiding place"

Geert van den Bos wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 2:20 am δύναμις ὑψίστου ἐπισκιάσει σοι

ἐπισκιάζω overshadow
https://biblehub.com/greek/1982.htm


σκιά shadow
https://biblehub.com/greek/4639.htm

Mark 4:30-32 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... ersion=ESV
Καὶ ἔλεγεν, Πῶς ὁμοιώσωμεν τὴν βασιλείαν τοῦ θεοῦ, ἢ ἐν τίνι αὐτὴν παραβολῇ θῶμεν; ὡς κόκκῳ σινάπεως, ὃς ὅταν σπαρῇ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, μικρότερον ὂν πάντων τῶν σπερμάτων τῶν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, καὶ ὅταν σπαρῇ, ἀναβαίνει καὶ γίνεται μεῖζον πάντων τῶν λαχάνων καὶ ποιεῖ κλάδους μεγάλους, ὥστε δύνασθαι ὑπὸ τὴν σκιὰν αὐτοῦ τὰ πετεινὰ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ κατασκηνοῦν.

I thought the mustardseed to be the letter "yud" = middle letter of Genesis 1:1 depicted as triangular form



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYBqaB-g3lA

"He made darkness His hiding place"

yes that's true, but don't you know how I preserved the patterns of 3 and 7 in my name?
629 is equal to the star comprising the 13th letter yud in it's center hexagram shield of David?


50
110
37
258
266
360
448

50*110*37*258*266*360*44=2252403901440000
with sum of hundreds= 2+252+403+904+440=1998 for the 7 numbers
and with take only the 3 first: 50*110*37=203500 or 703 for the first 3 to be exact with sum of hundreds patterns of 3/7 are respected...

now 50+110+37=197
and 50+110+37+258+266+360+448=1529
now take 1998*1529= 3054942 sum of hundred equal 942+54+3=999
and 197*703=138491 sum of hundreds: 629...
and even 629+999=1628 or 1+628=629 by sum of hundred.
629 is 17*37 the "good yud of light", the 13th in place of our genesis triangle.

for
triangle of genesis 1:1 comprising 28 letters

2
1+ 200
400 +10 + 300
1 +1 + 200 + 2
1 + 40 + 10 + 5 + 30
40+ 10 + 40+ 300 + 5 400
90 + 200 + 1+ 5+ 400 + 1 + 6


triangle of my name comprising 28 letters:
50
100+10
1+30+6
50+6+200+2
40+10+10+200+6
60+200+40+4+50+6
4+200+1+200+10+3+30

Look at what I just found while having a break from working on the database:

red W#1 + ord W#3 + std W#7 of Gen 1:1 is 13+41+296 = 350 = 10x 35 "proton" (E r)
red W#1 + ord W#3 + std W#7 of Gen 1:1 in reverse direction is 17+62+913 = 992 = 92 "electron" (E o) w. ext...
Sum = 1342 = TV of Vs(13 = Pri(7))

That is amazing. As we know the fine-structure constant (1/137.035999206) governs the strenght of the electromagnetic force between two charged particles like for example an electron and a proton.

6313 = Heptaflake(10 "Alpha" (G r)) = Comp-o(7239 = rs Luke 1:37) = “one thousand six hundred eighteen” (H & G rs)
= rs Seven Seven Seven Holograph = Lucky-o(69481 = Pri(6899 = Pri(888)))

A Heptaflake is six Centered Heptagons & Seven Heptagrams of the same order.

4245 "thirty and seven x seventy and three" (E s) = 3x1415 [π] = std Luke 1:37 = r+o+s Vs(299 (3 digits of c))
= L. from order 21 to 37 of Vs(55 = Tri(10) = Hepta(5)) & Vs(121771 = Tri(496) = Hepta(221))

1, 55 & 121771 are three first numbers that are both Triangle & Heptagon.
Triangles has 3 sides & heptagons has 7 sides.
21x37 = 777

Arnold Sommerfeld (1868-1951) was the first person to discover α in nature back in 1916. He found it as the proportion of the
speed of the electron (e) in its first orbit around a hydrogen atom nucleus & the speed of light (c) in the theoretical Bohr model.
The speed of the electron orbiting the atom is approximately 2.2 million m/s, which is about 137th the speed of light.

777 Codes: of Gematria and the Constants of Physics

α the fine-structure constant is considered as the most mysterious constant of them all. We can't really explain why it has the value of 137.

Here is some mysterious Nordic (Danish) music while that one sinks inn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uwl-DD ... rt_radio=1

rs Luke 1:37 = 3839 = 100x(34 = Pri-o(137)) + CW of rs Vs(137)
CW of rs Luke 1:37 = 346 = Pri-o(2333 "inverse Alpha" αντιστροφος Αλφα) = ro Vs(1 "α")
137 is inverse Alpha

CW of Luke 1:37 = 1292 = 1000 + 292 "one hundred and thirty seven" (E o) = Lucky-o(11803 = 1+21+11781)
1, 21 & 11781 are the three first numbers that are both Triangle & Octagon.
Triangles has 3 sides & Octagons has 8 sides.

rs = reverse standard
Vs = Verse#
CW = Center Word(s)
Pri-o = Prime order of
Comp-o = Composite order of
Lucky-o = Lucky order of

Seven Seven Seven Seven Holograph is the integration of verse# 1625 & the first verse with a std value of 1625.
1625 "seven hundred seventy and seven" שבע מאות ושבעים ושבע [Gen 5:31]

Alex wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 3:16 pm rs Luke 1:37 = 3839 = 100x(34 = Pri-o(137)) + CW of rs Vs(137)
CW of rs Luke 1:37 = 346 = Pri-o(2333 "inverse Alpha" αντιστροφος Αλφα) = ro Vs(1 "α")
137 is inverse Alpha

137 is the 33rd prime if you start with 2 as the first prime.

All you results are based fundamentally on taking 1 as the first prime.

I'd bet dollars to donuts you could find just as many "connections" if you took 2 as the first prime.

In my experience, you find good codes when using number 2 as the first prime.
But you find much better codes when using 1 as the first prime.

Word# 137 by rotation when counting in cycles by the number of words in Gen 1:1 is the center word with a value of 401.
401 = PP(38 "inverse" (E r) = "Alpha" (E o))
PP = Pythagorean Prime

401 + CW of Vs(401) = 769 = PrI(137)
5460 = Tri(104) = TV of Vs(5521 = Pri(731))

1 is after all the value of α.

Alex wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 5:48 pm In my experience, you find good codes when using number 2 as the first prime.
But you find much better codes when using 1 as the first prime.

Word# 137 by rotation when counting in cycles by the number of words in Gen 1:1 is the center word with a value of 401.
401 = PP(38 "inverse" (E r) = "Alpha" (E o))
PP = Pythagorean Prime

401 + CW of Vs(401) = 769 = PrI(137)
5460 = Tri(104) = TV of Vs(5521 = Pri(731))

1 is after all the value of α.

Hey Alex, thanks for including the explanations. That's very helpful!

The method you call "by rotation" is actually just modular arithmetic. It's often called "clock arithmetic" so your "by rotation" is apt, but I think it would be much clearer and cleaner to use the established mathematical terminology and notation. Let's compare:

ALEX SAYS: Word# 137 by rotation when counting in cycles by the number of words in Gen 1:1 is the center word with a value of 401.

MATH SAYS: 137 mod 7 = 4 and W4 is the center word of Gen1:1 = 401

Alex symbol count = 119
Math symbol count = 56

Better notation reduces the symbol count by 52%! It's both much more readable and mathematically precise. And since you used CW in the next line and Vs in the following, we could reduce it even more (down to 40 chars) like this:

137 mod 7 = 4 and W4 = CW of Vs(1) = 401

Of course, you should always include a glossary of your abbreviations used in every post, since very few people will have them memorized.

Moving on to the next line:

401 = PP(38 "inverse" (E r) = "Alpha" (E o))

You had ten numbers to choose from: five values for "inverse" and five values for "alpha". They have only one value in common:
And why did you choose to use the index of Pythagorean Primes? You could have used the index of primes or semiprimes or composites or any one of the dozens of other number sequences randomly use. If you can't explain your choice as based on any logical principle, then it is a textbook example of the fallacy of cherry picking. Your work is riddled with the error. It makes it look totally meaningless.

Moving on to the next line:

401 + CW of Vs(401) = 769 = PrI(137)

This is much better, since it builds on your first line since they both share three symbols: 401, CW, 137.

It feels like this is the essence of your "code". You think God "coded" something if you can manipulate the relations until you find repeated symbols. Is that correct?

To me, that looks like a game. Like the Game of Four Fours in which you manipulate combinations of four fours to express every integer, like this:
Can you explain why your game is any different?

Great chatting! And God bless you!

Richard

And why did you choose to use the index of Pythagorean Primes? You could have used the index of primes or semiprimes or composites or any one of the dozens of other number sequences randomly use. If you can't explain your choice as based on any logical principle, then it is a textbook example of the fallacy of cherry picking. Your work is riddled with the error. It makes it look totally meaningless.

Because I know codes that points to the Pythagorean prime order being relevant. Just look:

401 = PP(38)
CW of Vs(401) = 368 = perimeter of Octagram(8+8+8)

38 = code number for 888

Happy(123 = Semiprime(42 = CW of red Vs(38))) = 888


I prefer to use rot. instead of mod because there are too many things that remind me of "mod". Things like:
Mod for a program
Mod for a game
A weapons mod
The Mod Subculture: A significant cultural movement that emerged in the United Kingdom in the late 1950s.
The term "mod" is also used to describe a style of dress from the 1960s, which included miniskirts, bell-bottom trousers, and bold, bright patterns.
a "mod" is short for a moderator like you are here on this forum.
In mathematics, "mod" is short for modulus.
"Mod" is often used as a colloquial abbreviation for the word "modern."
In the United Kingdom, "MOD" is a common abbreviation for the Ministry of Defence.

Modulo Operation: The Remainder of a Division
In arithmetic and computer programming, the modulus (or modulo) operation finds the remainder after one number is divided by another.[1][2] This is often represented by the "mod" operator or the "%" symbol in programming languages.[3]
For example, "10 mod 3" would be 1, because 10 divided by 3 is 3 with a remainder of 1.[1] Similarly, "9 mod 3" would be 0, as 9 divides evenly by 3 with no remainder.

This concept is the foundation of modular arithmetic, a system where numbers "wrap around" after reaching a certain value, known as the modulus.[4] A common real-world example is a 12-hour clock, which operates on a modulus of 12.[4][5] If it's 9 o'clock, in 4 hours it will be 1 o'clock, because (9 + 4) mod 12 = 1.

I can't think of anything that reminds me of rot. so I will be using rot.
I can mix stuff up fast so I don't want to use mod. I hope you can understand.

And I have changed my signature now so that people know where to find the explenation of my abbreviations.