Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

[bluetriangle]

What is the probability of this:
FLW of rs Vs(726) = 777
CW of Vs(729) = 777
FLCW of rs Vs(777) = 726
15 verses has a rs FLW of 777
18 verses has a std CW of 777
23 verses has a rs FLCW of 726

I'm not sure I could do it. You've turned these into complicated calculations, because you keep changing systems. We have FLW, CW and FLCW. You also use standard and reverse standard. It would also depend on how many systems you accept, because each additional system complicates it further.

The second part is probably doable, but on first glance, all I can say is that 15, 18 and 23 are about what I'd expect. There is no code there, nothing.

The basic principle is that each time you have 31102 chances of hitting the number you want, which usually isn't far from the mean value for the sum of the first and the last words. Can you see that for a spread of 2000, you have a 1 in 2000 chance of hitting the number you want each time. With 31000 goes you are virtually certain to hit it a few times. The binomial formula tells you roughly what the modal value is, which is the highest probability (easily found by varying the number of successes). You are never far from that, so there is no code here.

The linking of verse 726 with an FLW of 777 has possibilities within that for a code being present, but you keep changing the system you use.

Alex, this is NOT how you look for codes. All you're doing is changing systems until you get what you want.

[Alex]

Are you really that blind that you don't see the design here?

So here we have the first & last words of rs verse# 726 (α w. upsidedown digit) = 777 = center words of verse# 729
726 = FLCW of rs verse# 777

The upsidedown digit is used with reverse standard here every time deliberatly. Think opposites.
726 uses opposite digit
rs is opposite to standard

It's really simple but you know there is no code here just because you say so
It's all random and meaningless according to you. But not according to these codes when you are being fair, Alpha is after all connected to 777 in these codes. So your verdict here that "there is no code" is wrong.

[bluetriangle]

Are you really that blind that you don't see the design here?

So here we have the first & last words of rs verse# 726 (α w. upsidedown digit) = 777 = center words of verse# 729
726 = FLCW of rs verse# 777

The upsidedown digit is used with reverse standard here every time deliberatly. Think opposites.
726 uses opposite digit
rs is opposite to standard

It's really simple but you know there is no code here just because you say so
It's all random and meaningless according to you. But not according to these codes when you are being fair, Alpha is after all connected to 777 in these codes. So your verdict here that "there is no code" is wrong.

I'm trying to help here, but your ego keeps getting in the way. 726 is The Messiah in Greek, but you think it's something to do with alpha, because that begins 0.00729735 .. . and you think 729 is code for alpha. It's not nearly accurate enough. 137 is code for 1/alpha, because the error is about 1 in 4000. But the error here is 1 in 1000, not really good enough to signify alpha. But let's be generous and say 729 is good enough. Except it isn't 729 in there anyway: it's 726, which is three less. But by your 'upside-down' code, 6 becomes 9 and we conjure up 729. But do we not also have to turn 7 and 2 upside-down too? That gives us two glyphs resembling 4 and 5. So isn't it 459 then? Do we flip the digits or rotate them? That would give us 954. Or do we rotate them individually?

Okay Alex, what does your code say? What is its message? What is God saying through it?

[Alex]

Oh so you want to go there now.

Alright, if 729 is not significant because it is not 0.007297352 then why do we see that verse# 729 (3 digits of α) by rotation is also verse# 1618033 (7 digits of φ)
And the center words of this verse = 777.

[Alex]

Okay Alex, what does your code say? What is its message? What is God saying through it?

That God really likes dimensionless constants. Especially Alpha.

FLW of John 1:1 = 428 = CW of Vs(137 (i. α))
CW of John 1:1 = 58 "inverse Alpha" (E r)

1777 "Alpha" Αλφα (Fo+Fs) = 1000 + 777
= CW of Vs(13) + CW of Vs(7) + CW of Vs(7+7+7)

[Alex]

FLW of Gen 1:1 = 1209 = Hepta(13 = Pri(7)) + Hepta(13 = Pri(7)) + Hepta(13 = Pri(7))
= CW of verses ordered at 729 (3 digits of α), 6180339 (7 digits of φ) & 777
= FLCW of rs Vs(927 = mirror of α = "seven seven seven" (H rs))

[Alex]

CW of verses orderd at 1 "α", 500 "φ" & 777 = 1039 = English ordinal verse# 777

[bluetriangle]

Oh so you want to go there now.

Alright, if 729 is not significant because it is not 0.007297352 then why do we see that verse# 729 (3 digits of α) by rotation is also verse# 1618033 (7 digits of φ)
And the center words of this verse = 777.

What do you mean by "by rotation"?

[bluetriangle]

Okay Alex, what does your code say? What is its message? What is God saying through it?

That God really likes dimensionless constants. Especially Alpha.

FLW of John 1:1 = 428 = CW of Vs(137 (i. α))
CW of John 1:1 = 58 "inverse Alpha" (E r)

1777 "Alpha" Αλφα (Fo+Fs) = 1000 + 777
= CW of Vs(13) + CW of Vs(7) + CW of Vs(7+7+7)

Well, the veracity of you evidence aside, I would have thought God was saying more to us than that. You have a website with about a million numbers on it (a feat in itself, I have to say) but all God is saying through it is that he likes alpha and other dimensionless constants? Surely there is more to it than that?

[SonOfZion232]

.